0385659806_01_lzzzzzzz The uniqueness of Mark Haddon’s book lies not entirely in its mystery plot but more so in the choice of its protagonist – a 15 year old boy with autism who is unable to comprehend facial expressions, slangs, tone of voice, humour, sarcasm and figures of speech – to undertake the exploration of the human condition. The story is told in the first person narrative by Christopher John Francis Boone in the form of a mystery novel school assignment.

It unfolds with the discovery of his neighbour, Mrs Shear’s pet poodle dead on her front lawn, impaled with a garden fork. Christopher is holding the dead dog in his arms when Mrs Shears opens her front door and screams. She calls the police and in the ensuing questioning, Christopher hits the police officer when he grabs his arm. He gets arrested for assault and is released with a caution.

Going home with his father, Ed Boone, we learn that father and son have been living alone for the past 2 years. Christopher’s mother, Judy apparently died of a heart attack though later on in the book, it becomes apparent that this is a lie by Ed to cover up the fact that Judy left him and Christopher for Mrs Shears’ husband, Roger.  An affair that would evolve to be central to Christopher’s investigation of the dog’s death – one that he doggedly pursues despite the repeated warnings by his father to cease it.

It is in this context that Haddon marvelously conveys the realm of autism to us through Christopher. We are privy to his ordered and routined life, eg. seeing 4 red cars on the road meant a good day, 5 red cars meant a super good day, or counting the number of times he played minesweeper in one afternoon (76 games) and playing the expert version in 102 seconds (which is 3 seconds off his own best time of 99 seconds), drinking orange squash at 2.07pm, insisting that there be no yellow colour in his food (often solved by adding red food colouring) because yellow amongst other things reminds him of sweet corn (it comes out in your poo and you don’t digest it so you are not really meant to eat it, like grass or leaves) or yellow flowers (hay fever from flower pollen).

Christopher sums up his mental condition like this -

My memory is like a film. That is why I am really good at remembering things, like the conversations I have written down in this book, and what people are wearing, and what they smelled like, because my memory has a smelltrack which is like a soundtrack.

And when people ask me to remember something I can simply press Rewind and Fast Forward and Pause like on a video recorder, but more like a DVD player because I don’t have to Rewind through everything in between to get to a memory of something a long time ago. And there are no buttons, either, because it is happening in my head.

Christopher’s inability to understand humour and taking everything in the literal sense provide for many moments of comedy. He struggles when hearing a joke, to suspend his mind’s inclination to view everything through logic. And yet Haddon successfully explains this to us so we see it from Christopher’s point of view.

This will not be a funny book. I cannot tell jokes because I do not understand them. Here is a joke, as an example. It is one of Father’s.

His face was drawn but the curtains were real.

I know why this is meant to be funny. I asked. It is because drawn has three meanings, and they are (1) drawn with a pencil, (2) exhausted, and (3) pulled across a window, and meaning 1 refers to both the face and the curtains, meaning 2 refers only to the face, and meaning 3 refers only to the curtains.

I try to say the joke to myself, making the word mean three different things at the same time, it is like hearing three different pieces of music at the same time, which is uncomfortable and confusing and not nice like white noise. It is like three people trying to talk to you at the same time about different things.

But most of all, this is a poignant story of a boy who ventures out of his safe cocoon in search of a logical solution to a simple mystery that isn’t so simple in the end. Christopher’s resort to mathematics to break down the complex situations he encounters only lends tenderness to his story, making us feel for him more.

Some things are common to us all – like emotions. We just feel it in different ways.

I give this book a 4 out of 5. It is short but very memorable. I’m really glad I read it.

Tagged with:
 

Blackwater_Scahill

This book begins with an explosive Hollywoodesque opening – a convoy of 4 large armoured vehicles belonging to Blackwater rolling through the streets of downtown Baghdad, stopping all other street traffic and raising tension with the heavy weaponry pointing everywhere as they protect and escort US VIPs out of their heavily fortified Green Zone.

The date, 16 September 2007 and the time, 12.08pm.

Iraqi police on duty scramble to stop traffic to make way for their American ‘liberators’. The convoy does a sudden u-turn and comes to an abrupt halt. A Blackwater operative manning one of the roof mounted heacy machine guns opens fire into the crowd of cars and people.

Total pandemonium ensues. A woman screams from inside a car. Her son, the driver, is in her arms, all covered in blood from a bullet to the forehead which leaves half his head gone.

Bullet casings continue to rain down from the armoured vehicles as another Blackwater gunner emerges and starts to shoot also. More pedestrians and drivers are shot. Cars explode and windscreens shatter. The grieving mother craddling her dead son is also shot. An Iraqi police officer at the scene later recalls witnessing her head explode and parts of it flying past him.

The explosion of smoke bombs to cover their exit from the area signal finally ended the carnage. 15 cars destroyed and 16 innocent Iraqies – men, women and children, dead. 2 burnt beyond recognition. The final tally of what came to be known as the Nisour Square Massacre.

Iraqi Prime Minister Nur al-Maliki called Blackwater’s act “criminal” and said that the Iraqi Government had had enough of the endless lethal incidents involving Blackwater operatives. This anger however, would be met by a standard US response in other Blackwater incidents – indifference, stonewalling and political foot-dragging in investigating and bringing the perpetrators to justice.

It pays to have friends in high places and Scahill reveals the intricate network of powerful allies and lobbyists Blackwater USA fostered and paid to protect its interests in the corridors of power. With the Nisour Square Massacre as the backdrop, Scahill launches into a comprehensive piece about the founder of Blackwater, Erik Prince and his privileged family history, his time as a Navy SEAL and his rise to prominence inside Prince Corporation – the company founded by Prince’s father, Edgar Prince – whose right-wing Chrisian values guided Prince Corporation’s policies and political causes that it supported.

This kind of upbringing would later be reflected in Erik Prince’s Blackwater USA (later Blackwater Worldwide), shaped as a self-righteous quasi-religious movement embarking on mercenary missions in the Middle East with the zeal of a Christian Crusader, with a narrow Christian worldview – seeing each mission not solely about protecting Amercian VIPs and their allies, but primarily about advancing the greater Amercian neo-conservative, far right Christian beliefs at that time being advocated by (and in sync with) the Bush Doctrine of actively promoting (where necessary, regime change courtesy of the US military and the ‘Coalition of the Willing’) liberal democracy around the world (notably Iraq and Afghanistan).

Scahill investigates the origins of Blackwater – how it was created as a response to, and evolved with the pressing need in America to retrain its law enforcement agencies and armed services with the emergence of the likes of Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing or the Columbine High School massacre and September 11, 2001.  The book shows how Blackwater slowly entrenched itself into the American military industrial complex, revolutionising the way the Government outsourced military services at a scale never seen before. Private corporations such as KBR (Kellogg, Brown & Root), DynCorp, Halliburton are all now the indispensable private contractor component in all recent American military foreign expeditions.

Prince describes this as inevitable as Governments the world over strive for leaner and meaner fighting forces – faster, better and cheaper. The military is not designed to be cost effective, and Prince often sums it up by posing this question -

” When you ship overnight, do you use the postal service or do you use FedEx? Our corporate goal is to do for the national security apparatus what FedEx did to the postal service.”

The book also highlights the ups and downs of Blackwater, beginning with the Nisour Square massacre and the subsequent vilification of Blackwater and other private security contractors in the media and by some quarters within the US Government and its revival in the court of public opinion after the ambush, mutilation and killing of its 4 of its personnel in Fallujah, allowing for an image ‘make-over’ with American propaganda painting the death of the 4 dead contractors as gruesome attacks on heroic  ‘civilian’ personnel on a “humanitarian mission”, a status often used very flexibly by Blackwater when explaining that it does not come under the purview of the military (in cases where they violate the terms of their service or from their assigned duties in supporting the military) – and in cases where its denouncers attempt to sue it through civilian courts, Blackwater attempts to revert to and obtain legal immunity from its other status as a component of the “US Total Force” – a status that Blackwater argues accords it a position within the many branches of the US Military, that is, the private contractor branch.

There are interviews with the families and colleagues of the murdered Blackwater operatives, bringing to light the operational failure on the day of the ambush, how personnel were often sent out into the field with less than sufficient armour and other hardware as cost and profit are given priority over the safety of its staff;  a trend that is increasing by the day as private security corporations such as Blackwater grow and start to behave like the profit-driven corporations that they truly are despite the occasional facade of patriotism and altruism that its founders like to put up publicly.

The signs are ominous – as companies like Blackwater expand and further entrench their presence in US military deployments, its army of private contractors are slowly moving to the fore and taking over more and more roles traditionally played by regular armed forces. Its obscure legal status – whether a civilian entity or a branch of the US military – allows it to utilize jurisdictional arbitrage to hinder attempts to bring it to account for its many trangressions. It becomes, in the end, the true coalition of the willing – voluntary, profit-driven mercenaries – who operate and are accountable to no one except their principals.

My verdict? 4 out of 5. This is a brilliant piece of investigative work, offering an in-depth discussion of the origins of Blackwater and similar corporations, the scandals and incidents that have defined it and the realpolitik it indulges in – lobbyists and spin doctors, the hiring of former top government officials to sit on its Board and head its management – to show that it’s going to be a permanent feature (and slowly, a substitute for) of the US fighting forces and how they will operate now and in the future.

Tagged with:
 

How To Kill, by Kris Hollington

HTKillpbHow To Kill: The Definitive History of the Assassin, by Kris Hollington is an enjoyable read. The Sunday Telegraph describes it as “A history of the late twentieth century punctuated by gunshots … exciting”, a praise I totally agree with.

And that’s exactly what this 426-page book is about, detailing 35 political assassinations (successful and failed attempts) from 1950 onwards.

Hollington introduces us to both assassins and their ‘targets’. We read about their lives and how their destinies cross paths on the fateful day of the assassination, studying the assassin’s motives and the choice of weapons and methods employed to complete the kill. A lot of effort also went into researching the historical background of each case, enabling the reader to understand each one in its proper context.

What I like the most about the book though is the detailed insight into each of the case that it offers. For example, in covering RFK’s assassination, Hollington also writes about the tragic consequences of his death on his family; the death of his son David Anthony Kennedy of a drug overdose 16 years later borne out of a frustrated life traumatized by the loss of his father.

Hollington also explores “what ifs” – what if RFK had become the President, what policies would he have pursued and how would history have been changed as a result?

Though some of the chapters cover infamous assassinations such as that  of the Kennedy brothers – Joseph and Robert, 1960s civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Pope John Paul II, the 1984 attempt on Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and her Conservative Party leaders at their annual party conference and Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin’s murder in 1995, half the book covers lesser known killings and attempts such as that on President Harry S. Truman in 1950, murderous Serbian paramilitary leader and later politician Zeljko ‘Arkan’ Raznatovic, the assassination of the Congo’s Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba on 11 February 1961 and the link of that murder to the violent killing of UN Secretary General Dag Hammarskjöld in a plane crash later that year on 18 September 1961 – a conspiracy involving the Belgian, US and British secret intelligence services that would only be uncovered some 40 years later.

How To Kill reads like a documentary-drama, fast paced with the right balance of factual substance and action thrill-ride.

I give it a 4 out of 5. I just wish it had photographs to complete it.

Kris Hollington is a freelance investigative journalist and author living and working in London. He has written a number of investigative pieces on subjects as diverse as mass murder, assassination, armed robbery, African drug smugglers, diamond mining, art and jewellery theft, the space race, HM Customs and Excise and police corruption for The Sunday Times, The Guardian, The Mail on Sunday, The News of the World, The Evening Standard, Arena and Loaded. Several of his articles and books have been featured on television and radio (including ITV1’s Real Crime and BBC Radio 4’s Saturday Play).

He is currently working on Baby X (Simon and Schuster, 2010), the inside story of one of the Metropolitan Police’s Child Protection Teams (the follow up to Crack House), and Narco Warrior, with Cameron Addicott. (Source: www.assassinology.org)

 

Simplexity, by Jeffrey Kluger

simplexityWhy is the stock market so hard to predict? Why do the jobs that require the greatest skills often pay the least? Why do companies with the least to sell often earn the most? Why are your cell phone and camera so absurdly complicated? Why are only 10 percent of the world’s medical resources used to treat 90 percent of its ills?

It’s hard to pick up and put down a book that asks such hard but simple questions and that’s how I ended up going home from my own bookstore with this book. It is light reading (only 277 pages) though a bit dry now and then in certain chapters. But still – don’t you just feel like you have to know the answers to those questions?

So what’s this thing called “Simplexity”?

Simplexity“, I now understand, is the study of why simple things become complex and how complex things can be made simple. It’s not an easy topic to write about – starting as it must, with the mess and ending with a simplified explanation. But credit must go to Kluger – he does a splendid job of peeling away the layers of complexity and laying bare the ‘how’ of things; making them simpler and easier to understand.

His analyses are based on a mix of different studies – sociology, psychology and economics, combining them all in easy to read fashion. Like explaining rocket science to a kid. A bit like Freakonomics, by Stephen Dubner and Steven Levitt – if you get my drift.

Take for example, the chapter entitled, “Why is it so hard to leave a burning building or an endangered city?” in which Kluger examines the life and death drama that unfolded on 9/11 when the masses of workers evacuated the burning towers of the World Trade Centre. While most of us would put it to pure luck who got out and survived, and who didn’t – Kluger puts it to a little bit of all this – fear, bravado, ignorance, ergonomics, fluid dynamics, engineering, psychology, design, architecture, planning, and physics.

Sounds complex? Ok – let’s simplify it.

Simplexity scientists liken people moving en masse to air molecules filling a room – randomly moving in all directions and filling all available space more or less evenly. In a stairwell setting, keep the flow of  people running down going and sooner or later, you’ll end up with a situation where the movement comes to a halt as people jam into all available space and becoming overloaded. This is the other end of the complexity arc. The middle of the arc is where true complexity starts to emerge – where the air molecules begin to take shape, or in the case of people – begin to move to the exits.

The same applies to water especially how it navigates around obstacles and waterways. Think of a boulder in the middle of a raging river and picture how the powerful current slows down and churns and swirls around it, transformed from one form of energy into another. Using this observation, designers have found that a single post positioned along the path to a fire exit does actually facilitate the process of escaping because it staggers their arrival slightly and avoiding the overloading effect that occurs at the end of the complexity arc.

That’s one example … which I simplified. You get the gist of what the book is about, no?

There are plenty more – all amusing but once in a while dry when the discussions get too technical or scientific. Maybe it’s your cup of tea, maybe not. You can always skip the tedious parts and focus on the answers to the ‘hook’ questions.

I give this book a 3 out of 5. Interesting book – a wonderful source of dinner-time conversation. And if you like the science behind the explanation, then you’ll love this book even more.

Jeffrey Kluger is a senior writer at TIME Magazine, and author of several books on science topics including Splendid Solution: Jonas Salk and the Conquest of Polio; Simplexity; Journey Beyond Selene; and Lost Moon: The Perilous Voyage of Apollo 13. The latter work was the basis for Ron Howard’s 1995 film Apollo 13. (Wikipedia.org)

Tagged with:
 

spookThis is my second book by Mary Roach. The first being Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers which I read a few years ago. I’ve also read a few articles by Ms Roach on and off in various publications such as GQ and Readers’ Digest and find her writing style humourous and engaging. It’s stand up but in a book, so to speak.

Six Feet Over (in the UK) is published as Spook: Science Tackles the Afterlife in the US – a title I think is more accurate and less misleading. Let me elaborate.

Firstly and personally, the topic of the afterlife is something that appeals to me. If you’re familiar with me, then you’ll know that I’ve written pieces on the paranormal on the Readingmonk.com based on my personal experiences. Hence, when I saw Six Feet Over, I thought it’d be a book on ghostly spectres and hauntings, or communications with beings from the other atmosphere. You know, something dramatic and spooky.

Though it does cover topics such as seances and voices of dead people recorded on tape, Ms Roach’s discussion of these don’t really go the direction I was hoping for. Instead, her approach is more scientific albeit in her trademark off-beat style. There is nothing here resembling any of the Ghost Hunters or Most Haunted tv episodes. To each his/her own, and I suppose Ms Roach’s angle would suit some of us just fine.

In Six Feet Over , the topics  of discussion range from reincarnation, the weight of a soul, ectoplasm, communicating with the dead to bizarre incidents of scientists attempting to find the human soul inside a spermatozoa using microscopes and scalpels.

I found the discussions just too heavy and protracted in some parts. Meaning to say, boring. And there are more of these bits than there are the fun or dramatic bits.  The chapters are inundated with historical facts and quotes from scientific journals; quite heavy reading (and at times, irrelevant) for anyone who’s just looking for a scary tale.

Again, to be fair, this is a good book if you’re into the science of these phenomenons – which is excellently covered by Ms Roach. For me, it was akin to buying a ticket for a roller-coaster ride only to have all the excitement fizzle out by an hour long explanation by the technician of how the roller-coaster works. But like I said – to each, his or her own.

I give this is 3. Know what you want. The title is a bit misleading. Funny in general.

Besides Stiff and Spook, Mary Roach is also the author of Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Sex and Science which I will also review in due course.

Tagged with:
 
 
close

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up